|
Power Survey 2000 - Analysis
... continued from Power
Survey 2000 - Initial Results
No Power, only Influence
Many people replied that they had no power, only
influence. Perhaps this is not so surprising. What was unexpected
was the number of Directors and Senior Managers who also claimed
this. I suspect that anyone reporting to them may well feel differently.
Curiously, I even had one Director wondering if he even had any
influence, and most worryingly of all, an HR Director who confessed
that their role was more like being the MD's PA! Also, my own experience
of working in organisations taught me that it doesn't matter if
the organisational chart is flat, circular to tapezoid in shape,
everyone knows who the powerful people in the team are, regardless
of title.
Power is a Dirty and Dangerous Word
Some people in the survey got quite upset about
the whole thing. One was even offended because the survey question
dared to suggest that they might have power. Some warned me that
power comes with "grave responsibilities" and a few questioned my
credentials for doing this kind of work. Others were warily interested
but demanded anonymity (this was explicitly guaranteed in my email)
and asked me to send them results, but to other email addresses,
presumably to prevent anyone in their organisation finding out.
This seems like the email equivalent of buying something and demanding
it in a plain brown wrapper!
Many people then seem to have an attitude to power
and influence which is similar to the Victorian attitude to sex.
Everybody's doing it, but we must under no circumstances talk about
it!
Power is Contextual and Cultural
Power and influence appear contextual. In one
meeting I might be using my experience, expertise and know how,
but in another I might be trying to influence people through the
use of my empathy and awareness. It all depends on whom I am trying
to influence and the given context of the situation.
Organisational culture also seems significant
in giving people messages about what is an acceptable strategy or
not. My experience though is that people use whatever strategy they
think will work, whether it is culturally or politically correct
or not. The relative privacy of email provided people with an opportunity
to "confess" their less savoury as well as some very bizarre sources.
Below is a small selection.
- Kellogg's Corn Flakes - This is perhaps more of a hygiene
factor, in other words, if I miss my Kellogg's I feel less powerful?
- Volume - this came with the attachment "he (or she) who
talks loudest in meetings gets heard".
- Animal Cunning - Notice the twin implications of stealth
and danger! This one came from an HR professional, which belies
the traditional image perhaps?
- Blackmail - The database also contains quite an unpleasant
selection of words like coercion, intimidation etc.
- High Heels - You will be relieved to know this came from
a female.
- Breasts - Along with High Heels and Breasts, from women
I also got good looks, youth, femininity, female vulnerability
and a range of other less "politically correct" replies. From
the men I tended to get more guarded and obvious responses at
first, but many PS's - the following quote being typical. "Actually
Mike, if I am really honest about this, I have been known to use
the fact that I am relatively young, good looking and still have
all my own teeth and hair, to influence people, women especially".
- Guardian Angels - I like the implication here that there
are people in high places who are looking out for me. So much
sexier than "mentoring" which came up quite a bit.
- Bullshit - Sad but true. Perhaps related to Volume and
if we think about it we probably know at least one person in our
organisation who uses these together.
- Blagging - The Concise Oxford Dictionary defines blagging
as "robbery, especially with violence." I am grateful to Gary
Miles at Roffey Park for pointing out that this is probably derived
from "Blaggard."
... continued in Power
Survey 2000 - Conclusions
This is an extract from an article written by
Mike Phipps for Training Journal in 2000.
Copyright
© 2003-08 Colin Gautrey and Mike Phipps. All Rights Reserved
|
|